Muzzling dissent and the ethics policy/denverpost.com
September 8th, 2011FYI
http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_17081306
“Boggs was accused of violating a board governance policy that calls for all members to speak with one voice in public. This kind of protocol is a procedural departure from the traditional Robert’s Rules of Order. It is sometimes called a “consensus model”, under which dissenting members of a board are obligated to stifle their disagreements after a majority vote, giving the public impressions of unanimity among the members. But this is a false impression when no such unanimity exists. It is also very convenient for the liberal majority to muzzle the board’s sole conservative voice.”
Blog:
It is quite possible that the MSJC “Ethics Code Policy” and administrative procedure as presented as an information item in the September Board Agenda could be similarly interpreted by the liberal majority board. The motivation of such adopted “consensus models” is to simply stifle debate of opposing opinions.



